the number of gifts, private planes and yachts and sculptures, and tuition gifts to his grandnephew that Thomas has received, many of them, if not all, should have been reported, and it is unique that we have a justice that is so impacted or so - has received so much largesse from a single source who, by the way, also has interest before the court." That way he's following the letter of the law.
I'm not saying that I'm getting money from the Judicial Education Project and there was another source where she got over $200,000 from an interest that filed an amicus brief before the court, because we can't find out about it all it said under the disclosure is, just list Liberty Consulting, don't tell us who the clients are. I think they should if they're getting $100,000 from a single source. "Justices don't have to list clients of their spouses. "Is that a fair assessment of where we are?" "What appears to be happening in this great careful document sourced reporting in The Washington Post and the ProPublica reporting is that every document reveals that Clarence Thomas isn't abiding by the court's own disclosure laws," said anchor Nicolle Wallace. This comes amid new reporting that right-wing judicial activist Leonard Leo and eventual Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway arranged a secret payment to Virginia "Ginni" Thomas through an organization that successfully lobbied the Supreme Court to undermine the Voting Rights Act in a landmark 2013 decision - and further reporting on the gifts Thomas himself received from billionaire benefactor Harlan Crow. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is effectively able to "launder money" through his wife, argued Gabe Roth of the watchdog group Fix the Court on MSNBC Friday.
0 kommentar(er)
